NATO

Why I do not think that we will see all the documents pertaining to the JFK assassination, 9/11 or any of the other events or complexes

This is probably the fourth time I am trying to write this post. At first I thought I would lay out the information that I had found and read in detail, but any time I started, it became just too long and you are most capable of reading all of those sources and more for yourself.

My goal here ultimately is to lay out my thoughts and show you how I came to my conclusions. And as I lay them out to you, I may be able to refine them myself and of course as always I will be looking forward to your own thoughts, perhaps showing me where I may be going off in the wrong direction. With the ultimate goal again to further my understand of the world and why we are where we are today.

These are very interesting times. There is a lot of information pouring in from all sides and to me a lot of them seem to fit together nicely. Lets start with a piece of the puzzle that came out just recently. I am sure a lot of you have seen it. The statements made by the congresswoman and veteran Anna Paulina Luna.

She is heading the new House Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets and as such has made some big promises. Some of you, who have read my previous posts, may understand that I am a bit weary.

Let me lay out for you why. Does anyone remember what we know about coups and planned assassinations and what follows those? Apart from all of the coups d'état in the Middle East or South America done in the past by the US and Britain, according to John Bolton it is really not all that easy. And you have to be really brainy to pull it off, too!

And usually, right after one head of a nation has been cut off, it is being replaced with someone new. Someone more open to the suggestions by the perpetrators of the coup d'état. Or simply totally under the control of that foreign actor who did the cutting in the first place.

An example as to how that person may be found was given through that famous phone call of Victoria “Fuck the EU“ Nuland the then Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the United States Department of State and Geoffrey Pyatt then US Ambassador to Ukraine.

Now, let me ask you. given hat we already know about the assassination of the elected president JFK back in 1963, and the information above, would you thing that right after JFK was dead the US “became“ a Democracy (or Republic if you prefer that)?

Would who ever put a lot of effort and planning into killing a sitting president of the US, after having been successful, just simply pad themselves on their backs and say “Well done! Lets go, grab a beer!” and retire, slink away and become a good citizen of the country, a nice neighbor who is just like everyone else?

I don’t think so. My thoughts are that after that coup, there was not a single election that actually meant anything in the US. At least since 2014 we have a study that seems to show that the US has more in common with an Oligarchy.

And I am almost certain that basically has been the way things were since at least 1963.

If you have not noticed, there basically has not been a single government of another country that has said “Hey! Hang on a minute, something smells fishy here!”. Why is that you think? (or at least not that the general public has been told by any government or media outlet)

Ok, hang on here. Let me put on the breaks. I do realize, that this maybe a pill that is hard to swallow and I am basically challenging a lot here. Trust me, I do not like this one bit. The consequences of this line of thinking are enormous. If I am correct, it would mean that we are not living in the world as we were told it would be.

One where there is a clear part of the world that is standing for values like freedom, peace and everything that is good. And then there is the rest of the world where who knows what kinds of people are in power.

And now I am asking you to reevaluate the information that you have and consider that the conclusion may be that the West may not be what we all thought it was. And yes, I count myself to that group of people. I was not asked where I wanted to be thrown into this world but yeah, turns out it was part of the “West“.

Let me show you some more pieces and show you why I think they are important.

The above is a screenshot from an article written by Ambassador Mark A. Green, April 2nd 2024! It is important to understand how significant the event of 9/11 was to NATO, specifically! It was the only time in the history of the existence of NATO that article 5 had been invoked. And it has not been lifted since! I cannot stress this point enough!

So lets actually go back a little. Let us look at some of the things that happened after WW2, or the things that came out since then, that may be of importance to understanding why NATO was created back then and what the goal may have been (apart from the publicly stated one of being a defense pact).

NATO came into existence on April 4th 1949 with Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, The United Kingdom and the United States of America as the first 12 founding members. A “short“ history can be found here.

I would like to point out two or three things though in that “A short history of NATO” piece. First, just for fun, search for the name “Adolf Heusinger”. I will come back to the result of that search. First the other remarks I want to make.

First of, who doesn’t remember how NATO really had no other choice than to bomb the shit out of Yugoslavia for 2 months, 2 weeks and 3 days straight? And why? Because of the ethnic cleansing of Albanians. Can you imagine? NATO coming to the rescue of a people because they are being ethnically cleansed? What a world! How lucky were those Albanians, not living in Gaza and not being Palestinians!

And boy! NATO was so bad ass, that the Soviet Union was shacking in its boots! That was the only reason why the red flood did not sweep across Europe. Did they want to though? And thank god they only used measured force. Who knows how many more civilians could have died and how much more would have been destroyed. And a good thing that it was the first time they could make sure they work well together. Even though none of the members had been attacked.

And so in 1999 NATO stated that they now need some other target cause you know, no Soviet Union anymore. How prescient of them. As if someone could have know of an event before it happened. And if you have read my previous piece, you know that I am 100% that we were and still are not being told, what exactly happened on 9/11. But I do agree with their statement on violent extremists and civilian populations. I just don’ think they come from the Middle East.

And do remember the words of Lord Robertson: “NATO’s transformation in the post 9/11 world has begun.“.

Thank god there is NATO. They are cool *sarcasm off*.

Lets go back to Heusinger, cause I really do not think that NATO was ever meant as a Defensive tool. I think it was the continuation of a dream that many people in high places had. War against Russia. Starting with Churchill, who wanted to immediately start another World War at the end of the Second one with Operation Unthinkable, using German troops.

Is it not weird, that NATO did not mention Adolf Heusinger in its short history? Why do you think is that? Could it be that someone thought it maybe not wise to point out that someone who was responsible for Operation Barbarossa was the Chairman of the standing Military Committee? And just for a bit of a chuckle, of course “chairman“ is of course outdated, cause in 2021 they made sure that it is actually a gender-neutral position, so it is now only called chair. Wanna make a guess how many women have held that position in the past?

Lets take a look at the Congressional Record from April 19th, 1961, specifically the remarks made by one congressman Wayne Morse. You can find his insights on pages 58-61.

How bizarre is it that someone like Heusinger was put into the position of CMC at NATO, when it was supposed to be a purely defensive organization? I mean sure, that it must have been an affront to the Russians probably does not need a lot more explanation, right? And someone did not mind being equated with that Third Reich policies. When it comes to the third block i marked, please help me out: When was there a time and place where the voices and the suffering of thousands of Jews did have no weight again? I really cannot think of any place or time. None at all. Maybe someone should have asked Adolf Heusinger?

Enough about Heusinger… almost. lets see where he was immediately after WW2 and see if we get some more pointers there that could challenge the perception of the West being that awesome wonderland of the free and peace loving civilized people.

What do you know about Camp King? Some pointers are here, here and here.

Is that unrelated? Am I making too far a jump here? Maybe. I want to show you how little we know about what those most vile of people were used for. I want to show you that goals do not justify the means. If you utilize murderers and monsters, you cannot claim to be the purest of the pure. And the West used everything they could but made damn sure that the general public was kept uninformed.

NATO used former Nazis and fascists for their own purposes. And as has been known for some time, they used them against the civilian population. Like in the Stay-Behind program to most known as Gladio. However those that know about Gladio sometimes seem to forget, that those were under the command of NATO, that they were not just in Italy, but basically in every European Nation.

And to this day we know actually extremely little about them. For instance what was the situation in Germany? We know already that basically everything that could raise their right outstretched arm was given a position somewhere. There was KIBITZ. Then we have learned that there was supposedly another one which was created by Albert Schnez, with the support of the Gehlen Organization and with the knowledge of Adolf Heusinger and the then Chancellor Konrad Adenauer.

Interestingly enough the Stay-Behind Army of Albert Schnez we learned ybout from the ‘Independent‘ historic commission of the BND… quotation marks, because it was paid for by the BND, and the man who happened to find out about ‘Unternhemen Versicherungen‘(Schnez-Truppe Stay-Behind Army) is the son of a former vicepresident of the BND who had worked for the BND since 1964 and who happened to have been adopted by one Albert Kesselring, who later in life became the president of Stahlhelm.

By the way, that was all known, the fact that Rudolf-Rainer Kesselring, the father of Agilolf Kesselring, had ‘special‘ familiar ties, as can bee seen from this short piece in Der Spiegel.

But lets come back to the beginning. The last 5 years there was this whole brouhaha with a virus and a ‘vaccine‘. Just quickly, where are we that? In 2025 the CDC still recommends babies receive a good chance of getting myocarditis before the age of 1 years.

Do you remember “violent extremists were determined to target civilian populations“? I know what kind of people come to my mind.

Do you really think that the Task Force will produce anything that would make the public understand that they have been lied to at least since the end of WW2? Really?

I am expecting a limited hangout. It would make sense. Cause the reality we are being presented is already just a limited hangout. We know so much about the US, Nazis and Germany. But what do we know about Nazis and Spain? What do we actually know about Nazis and France? Nazis and Britain? Nazis and Australia? Nazis and New Zealand? Nazis and Canada? Nazis and Ukraine? Nazis and Israel?

From my limited research I can say not really much. One last example for Nazis and France.

In Germany there are going to be elections soon. One of the political parties, the SPD is advertising on X that they have never worked with Nazis. I got this screenshot early. By now there are more than 800k views.

Problem? Its a lie.

Günter Hellwing

Apart from Hellwing you had Helmut Knochen, Hans Henschke and Rolf Mühler working together at the insurance company Herbert E. Hofer in Mühlheim an der Ruhr.

And the French secret service SDECE had a secret agreement with Reinhard Gehlen who was then chief of the Bundesnachrichtendienst, the German secret service, to be allowed to commit murder in Germany without any repercussions. Of course France did not seek to kill those SD and Gestapo murders. Why would they?

Last thought I would like to leave you with: Just because you have not heard any of this from any of the main news sources does not mean its not true. Never forget, that the main news sources may not be telling you all you actually need to know. And when it comes to ‘need to know‘, I think you should be aware that someone out there knows how to make use of the results of the Milgram experiment and the Solomon Ash Conformity Line experiment and they are using it against you.